Why Technical English

One way to understand PageRank | February 15, 2012

Dear friend of Technical English,
In the following text I am trying to explain how I understand the topic. After having studied different sources I have drawn up this post.
The post topic is important for every blogger who wants to have a quality blog with quality content which attracts search engines and visitors. On the other hand, it is a great opportunity for writing a lively technical text for studying Tech English online. So, study the topic, study Tech English and write comments, which is the best way for practising the language.
Find necessary terminology in the Internet English Vocabulary.
Galina Vitkova



Is a link analysis algorithm used by the Google Internet search engine. The algorithm assigns a numerical weighting to each element of hyperlinked documents on the World Wide Web with the purpose of “measuring” its relative importance within it. According to the Google theory if Page A links to Page B, then Page A is saying that Page B is an important page. If a page has more important links to it, then its links to other pages also become more important.

Principles of PageRank


PageRank was developed at the Stanford University by Larry Page (thus the term PageRank is after him) and Sergey Brin as part of a research project about a new kind of a search engine. Now the “PageRank” is a trademark of Google. The PageRank process has been patented and assigned to the Stanford University, not to Google. Google has exclusive license rights on this patent from the university. The university received 1.8 million shares of Google in exchange for use of the patent; the shares were sold in 2005 for $336 million.
The first paper about the project, describing PageRank and the initial prototype of the Google search engine, was published in 1998: shortly after, Page and Brin founded the company Google Inc. Even if PageRank now is one of about 200 factors that determine the ranking of Google search results, it continues to provide the basis for all of Google web search tools.
Since 1996 a small search engine called “RankDex” designed by Robin Li has already been exploring a similar strategy for site-scoring and page ranking. This technology was patented by 1999 and was used later by Li when he founded Baidu in China.

Some basic information about PageRank

There is some basic information, which is needed to know for understanding PageRank.
First, PageRank is a number that only evaluates the voting ability of all incoming (inbound) links to a page.
Second, every unique page of a site that is indexed in Google has its own PageRank.
Third, internal site links interact in passing PageRank to other pages of the site.
Forth, the PageRank stands on its own. It is not tied in with the anchor text of links.
Fifth, there are two values of the PageRank that should be distinguished:
a. PageRank which you can get from the Internet Explorer toolbar (http://toolbar.google.com);
b. Actual or real PageRank that is used by Google for calculation of ranking web pages.
PageRank from the toolbar (sometimes called the Nominal Pagerank) has value from zero to ten. It is not very accurate information about site pages, but it is the only thing that gives you any idea about the value. It is updated approximately once every three months, more or less, while the real PageRank is calculated permanently as the Google bots crawl the web finding new web pages and new backlinks.
Thus, in the following text the term actual PageRank is employed to deal with the actual PageRank value stored by Google, and the term Toolbar PageRank concerns the evaluation of the value that you see on the Google Toolbar.

This is how the PageRank works.

The Toolbar value is just a representation of the actual PageRank. While real PageRank is linear, Google uses a non-linear graph to show its representation. So on the toolbar, moving from a PageRank of 2 to a PageRank of 3 takes less of an increase than moving from a PageRank of 3 to a PageRank of 4.
This is illustrated by a comparison table (from PageRank Explained by Chris Ridings). The actual figures are kept secret, so for demonstration purposes some guessed figures were used:

If the actual PageRank is between

The Toolbar Shows

0.00000001 and 5
6 and 25
25 and 125
126 and 625
626 and 3125
3126 and 15625
15626 and 78125
78126 and 390625
390626 and 1953125
1953126 and infinity


The PageRank Algorithm

Lawrence Page and Sergey Brin have published two different versions of their PageRank algorithm in different papers.

First version (so called the Random Surfer Model) was published on the Stanford research paper titled The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine in 1998:

PR(A) = (1-d) + d(PR(T1)/C(T1) + … + PR(Tn)/C(Tn))

Where PR(A) is the PageRank of page A.
d is a damping factor, which is set between 0 and 1, nominally it is set to 0.85.
PR(T1) is the PageRank of a site page pointing to page A.
C(T1) is the number of outgoing links on page T1.

In the second version of the algorithm, the PageRank of page A is given as:

PR(A) = (1-d) / N + d (PR(T1)/C(T1) + … + PR(Tn)/C(Tn))

Where N is the total number of all pages on the Web.

The first model is based on a very simple intuitive concept. The PageRank is put down as a model of user behaviour, where a surfer clicks on links at random. The probability that the surfer visits a page is the page PageRank. The probability that the surfer clicks on one link at the page is given by the number of links at the page. The probability at each page that the surfer will get bored and will jump to another random page is the damping factor d.

The second notation considers PageRank of a page the actual probability for a surfer reaching that page after clicking on many links. The PageRanks then form a probability distribution over web pages, so the sum of all pages PageRanks will be one.

As for calculating PageRank the calculations by means of its first model are easier to compute because the total number of web pages is disregarded.



Dear friend of technical English,  

Do you want to improve your professional English?

Do you want at the same time to gain comprehensive information about the Internet and Web?

Subscribe to “Why Technical English”  clicking   RSS – Posts



  1. Admiring the dedication you put into your blog and interesting insight you offer here. It’s great to discover a blog in a rare occasion that is not all the same out of date rehashed material. Great job! I’ve saved your site and I’m adding your RSS feed to my Google account now. On top of that, I like your website so much that I would like to advertise my own site http://www.emt.co.il on it. I would appreciate you write me at: everythingrainbowhk (AT) gmail.com specifying your quarterly ad rates. Looking forward to your email!

    Comment by Israel Investigations — February 15, 2012 @ 11:05 pm

    • I have just sent e-mail to to you with my acception of your add.

      Comment by gvitkova — February 19, 2012 @ 9:59 pm

  2. If you have scrapebox you probably spend hours in scrapping and building Blog list.

    For you:

    – 267030 Main Auto Approve Blog List
    – 1566 .EDU Auto Approve List
    – 1510 DoFollow List
    – 7514 High PR Blog List
    – 5973 Unique Auto Approve Domains

    Download here: mediafire.com/?44e4ufs8ljfc7bw

    Happy Link Building http://myseofiverr.com/seo-service.gif

    Comment by rseooneke — February 29, 2012 @ 6:26 pm

  3. You are so awesome! I do not suppose I’ve read anything like this before. So good to discover someone with a few original thoughts on this subject. Really.. many thanks for starting this up. This website is one thing that is needed on the web, someone with a bit of originality!

    Comment by Usenet Download Free — March 5, 2012 @ 1:30 pm

  4. […] for Exercise 1 it is based on the technical text One way to understand PageRank at the blog Why Technical English. The structure of the exercise is influenced by above mentioned […]

    Pingback by Build sentences afresh – ViCTE Newsletter Number 37 / March 2012 « Train Technical English — March 24, 2012 @ 11:53 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

    February 2012
    M T W T F S S
    « Jan   Mar »

    Blog Stats

    • 204,534 hits

    Subscribe with BlogLines


    Dynamic blog-up


    Join the discussion about


    I <3 SEO moz

    Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.