In order to make our debate more vivid and more animated I am appending several items about Web 2.0.
The term “Web 2.0” became known after the O’Reilly Media Web 2.0 conference in 2004. According to Tim O’Reilly:
“Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry caused by the move to the Internet as a platform, and an attempt to understand the rules for success on that new platform. “
Although the term suggests a new version of the World Wide Web, it does not propose any update to any technical specifications. It is rather about changes in the ways software developers and end-users utilize the Web.
Nevertheless, Web 2.0 comprises the idea of more widespread application of interconnectivity and interactivity of web-delivered content. Building applications and services around the unique features of the Internet are considered Web 2.0 main characteristics.
By O’Reilly four levels in the hierarchy of Web 2.0 sites could be distinguished:
- Level-3 applications, exist only on the Internet. Examples are eBay, Craigslist, Wikipedia, del.icio.us, Skype, dodgeball, AdSense.
- Level-2 applications can operate offline but gain advantages from going online. For example, Flickr benefits from its shared photo-database and from its tag database.
- Level-1 applications operate offline but gain features online (Google Docs & Spreadsheets, iTunes).
- Level-0 applications work as well offline as online. Examples are MapQuest, Yahoo! Local, Google Maps, Gmail.
Basic Characteristics
Web 2.0 websites enable users to build on the interactive facilities of “Web 1.0”. It allows users to run software applications fully through a browser. Users can own the data on a Web 2.0 site and control those data. These sites may have a so-called “Architecture of participation” that stimulates users to add value to the application as they use it. It is in contrast to traditional websites, which only limited visitors may view and whose content only the site’s owner could modify. Web 2.0 sites often feature a rich, user-friendly interface based on AJAX (asynchronous JavaScript and xml) and similar client-side interactivity frameworks, or full client-server application frameworks.
According to Best, the characteristics of Web 2.0 are: rich user experience, user participation, dynamic content, metadata, web standards and scalability. Further essential attributes of Web 2.0 include openness, freedom and collective intelligence in the sense of user participation.
Technology overview
“Web 2.0″ applications are loosely associated with technologies such as wikis, blogs, social-networking, open-source, open-content, file-sharing, peer-production, etc.
Web 2.0 websites usually involve some of the following techniques (sometimes the acronym SLATES is used to refer to them):
Search
the ease of finding information through keyword search which makes the platform valuable.
Links
guide to important pieces of information. The best pages are the most frequently linked to.
Authoring
the ability to create constantly updating content. In wikis, the content is iterative in the sense that people undo and redo each other’s work. In blogs, content is accumulated in posts and comments of blog visitors.
Tags
classification of content by creating tags that are simple, one-word descriptions to facilitate searching and to avoid rigid, pre-made categories.
Extensions
automation of some of the work and pattern matching.
Signals
the use of RSS (Really Simple Syndication) technology to inform users about any changes of the content by sending e-mails to them.
Criticism
There is an opinion that “Web 2.0″ does not represent a new version of the World Wide Web at all. In fact, the WEB1 technologies and concepts are constantly applied in WEB2, too. For example, AJAX do not substitute protocols like HTTP, but add a further layer of abstraction on top of them. Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the WWW, described the term “Web 2.0″ as a “piece of jargon”:
“Nobody really knows what it means…If Web 2.0 for you is blogs and wikis, then that is people to people. But that was what the Web was supposed to be all along.”
Nonetheless, the “WEB 2.0″ service mark was registered at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on June 27, 2006. The European Union application remains currently pending after its filing on March 23, 2006.
Reference:
Wikipedia, the free enciclopedia










7 responses so far ↓
Topics about Technology » Some items about WEB 2.0 // March 29, 2009 at 8:39 am |
[...] Why Technical English placed an interesting blog post on Some items about WEB 2.0Here’s a brief overviewComposed by Galina Vitkova In order to make our debate more vivid and more animated I am appending several items about Web 2.0. The term “ Web 2.0 ” became known after the O’Reilly Media Web 2.0 conference in 2004. According to Tim O’Reilly : “Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry caused by the move to the Internet as a platform , and an attempt to understand the rules for success on that new platform. “ Although the term suggests a new version o [...]
Some items about WEB 2.0 - eBiadoliny.info | Best Information Blog // March 29, 2009 at 8:59 am |
[...] the original here: Some items about WEB 2.0 :business, computer, debate, galina-vitkova, internet, media, more-animated, opportunity, [...]
Topics about Softwares » Archive » Some items about WEB 2.0 // March 29, 2009 at 5:04 pm |
[...] Caleb Booker put an intriguing blog post on Some items about WEB 2.0Here’s a quick excerpt“Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry caused by the … of “Web 1.0”. It allows users to run software applications [...]
invilalge // April 5, 2009 at 8:51 pm |
Great site this techenglish.wordpress.com and I am really pleased to see you have what I am actually looking for here and this this post is exactly what I am interested in. I shall be pleased to become a regular visitor
Fessexy // April 11, 2009 at 6:34 am |
rated site this techenglish.wordpress.com formidable to see you have what I am actually looking for here and this this post is exactly what I am interested in. I shall be pleased to become a regular visitor
Marek Silber // May 3, 2009 at 3:18 pm |
Web 2.0 is very usefull for us, because application asi gmail, wikipedia, skype, flickr and etc are very intuitive and good applicable for us. These applications spare many time when we find something or publishing photos….
Skrabanek Jiri // May 4, 2009 at 10:05 pm |
Web2 extends the web in an cool flexible application. It can be also annoying if the web2 is more intelligent than we want to.